Many license law questions will be answered at DFPR’s website.
If you have legal questions, are an Illinois sponsoring broker and a member of the Illinois Association or REALTORS, you may use the IAR Legal Hotline by calling Betsy Urbance at 800-952-0578 (9 am- 2:30 pm). You may also email her at BUrbance@iar.org.
Remember that every case is a little different. You may want to consider asking for an "advisory letter" from DFPR or seek your own legal council (always a good idea!)
The following are recent questions asked in class that might be on interest to you, or needed additional research:
EXTRA STUFF FROM SOUTH CAROLINA ABR CLASSES:
LICENSING BY RECIPROCITY (FROM WISCONSIN CLASS):
Yes. If a Wisconsin broker wishes to qualify in a normal way (take the classes, pass the exam) and NOT by reciprocity, the requirement to be a broker in your home state does not apply. Keep in mind that when licensed by reciprocity. all other rules apply, except the requirement to have an office in Illinois.
ETHICS (FROM EDWARDSVILLE CLASS):
If you read that section thoroughly, it says "in response to inquires". Thus, there is no affirmative obligation to disclose multiple offers unless asked.
Keep in mind that the listing agent must always keep the seller's best interest in mind. If the listing agent and the seller have discussed this issue, and the seller is lead to believe that all buyers will be told when there are multiple offers, then it would be a good idea for the listing agent to disclose, even if not asked, as that is what the seller expects.
ADVERTISING ISSUES
No, no such requirement exists per se.
Based on the new case interpretation from NAR, regarding Standards of Practice 12-10 and 12-12, the answer would be "no". A URL or domain name should not contain "MLS", unless that is part of the real estate company's name. It is considered misleading, as the public might assume it is an official website for a local MLS.
There is no definitive answer here, according to NAR. Article 12 does not specifically reference email addresses, however it does mandate a "true picture" in all representations. Cases such as these would obviously be decided by a hearing panel, should a complaint me filed.
According to DFPR, the answer is "NO", it is not a violation, assuming it can still be used as a duplex after it is sold.
According to DFPR, the answer is "NO"
Yes! There would need to be some sort of disclosure of the licensee's status. Refer to section 10-30 c-2-B of License Law
According to my sources at DFPR, this would probably be ok, as long as there is no indication that he is offering real estate services. However, remember that when licensees engage in practices that are new, on the edge, or provocative, it often draws the attention and scrutiny of their colleagues. Thus, complaints may be filed, although unfounded. For those reasons, many may opt to take the path of least resistance and include the sponsoring broker's business name.
DISCLOSURE ISSUES
Yes. The sellers should adjust the seller disclosure sheet, unless they have the problems repaired.
If the problems are NOT repaired, the listing agent MUST disclose those items, even if the seller doesn't.
Per Betsy Urbance: "If a buyer gives the seller a copy of the report, I assume the seller can use it for his information. However, my guess is that the inspector has limited the scope and permissible use of the report to the buyer who paid for it, and there will be language in the report to that effect. That is one concern. In addition, it is quite possible that the inspector has a copyright on the report, either at common law or by registration. Thus, if the seller were to copy or in some way distribute this report without the consent of the inspector, he may be violating the inspector's copyright."
Response from Betsy Urbance: I do not think this is something that the listing agent could
legally require by adding in the MLS remarks section. If the listing agent is suggesting to his seller client that Internet lenders not be used, he should be careful that he is presenting information to his client accurately and fairly with non-biased information. It is the seller's decision. So, if a remark like this appears in the MLS, it should be at the seller's direction and not according to the listing agent's discretion. Sellers are typically not bound by the license law or REALTOR Code of Ethics (unless of course they are actually licensees/REALTOR members).
REFERRAL FEES
The answer is "NO" to the first question.
Someone can donate to charity all they want, but if the amount donated is tantamount to an unpaid referral fee, it simply cannot be done.
No. They could only receive referral fees for referring prospective residential tenants to other leasing companies or landlords. That fee would also have to be paid through the sponsoring broker.
This is a tough question and I can't even get DFPR and legal counsel to agreed! The issue is whether attendance at a broker open house constitutes a "licensed activity". If it does, then technically all compensation must flow through the sponsoring broker. My advice: stick to giving out food. If you have a cash drawing, the safe way is to make the check payable to the sponsoring broker.
For certain, there could also be a problem with drawings under Illinois gaming laws. The risk is probably minimal as long as the prize is small.
LICENSING AND RENEWAL
Maybe. If you are an employee of the owner of the property, you would be exempt. Also, if you are an employee of a property manager AND live on the premises you help manage, you are exempt as a resident manager. Note that you have to be an EMPLOYEE, not an independent contractor.
If you do need a license, you could get a regular salesperson license (45 hours of class), or you could also get a leasing agent license (15 hours of class), which allows you to do just residential leasing activities. I offer both classes in Bloomington. Check my schedule under "Prelicense".
According to license law, you must complete the class within 180 days AFTER receiving your broker's license. The class must be taken live; there is no home study version available.
If you receive your broker's license less than 180 days before in renews (April 30, 2008), I would recommend waiting until May 2008 to take the class. It will then count towards fulfilling your obligations as a new license as well as the requirement for the next renewal period (April 2010). To accommodate this, I have scheduled a class in Peoria on May 28, 2008. See My Schedule for details.
According to DFPR, the answer is yes, you could work for different brokers in different states, according to Illinois law. You should check with the other state involved, to be sure their law allows it.
Response from Betsy Urbance: There are all kinds of potential issues here. If the agent is
the listing agent only, then he should not be recommending these services to buyers anyway. If he is a dual agent, he might offer some suggestions if he has knowledge about reputable lenders and/or home inspectors. This is true if he is only the buyer's agent too.
If he is REQUIRING the use of particular service providers, then he is likely taking on a host of potential liability issues. If his brokerage business is affiliated with any of these services, he would also have RESPA issues if he were REQUIRING these services. Suppose, for example, the buyer agent requires that Home Inspector Z be use. Z misses a big defective condition and buyer is looking to sue someone. I would think the agent who required the use of Z would be buying into more potential liability than he should in the prudent practice of real estate brokerage. This does not mean that you can't make recommendations to reputable providers
If it is a FACT the agent was not licensed at the time, you would not pay their sponsoring broker on the theory that you would be knowingly aiding and abetting the unlicensed practice of real estate, which is illegal. If the facts aren't totally clear, time to contract DFPR!
Yes, as long as Agent A is not licensed by reciprocity, he could be licensed in another state by different broker.Regarding the referral fees, I think you would have to look at where the agent was "working" at the time of the referral. It could also be handled through the broker's independent contractor agreement.
There appears to be a difference of opinion on that one. It is being changed in the next book rewrite.
The point that the book is trying to make is that a selling sponsoring or managing broker, especially in a small office, may have access to both buyer and seller files. If that is the case, dual agency should probably be declared.
ENVIRONMENTAL
Yes. It goes into affect January 1, 2008 and will mirror the lead base paint law. Sellers will have to complete a form, disclose any test results and give an informational pamphlet on radon. Watch for news from your local Realtor association, or visit www.IllinoisRealtor.org to download the form and additional information.
The law toook effect on January 1, 2007 and generally requires a detector within 15' of all sleeping areas in dwellings that have any type of gas appliance. It will affect owner-occupants as well as tenants. Click here to see the full text of the new law.
Yes and there were some revision in 2007. It sets in place ways that some tenants can have their units tested by public healtofficials and requires posting of warning signs in the lobbies of buildings that have had mitigation notices issued. Click here for the complete story.
ESCROW
No. According to Rules section 1450.175-g, the money should be dispersed according to "the written direction of the principals" in the transaction. The settlement sheet would be considered "written direction" when signed by the buyer and seller. Thus, the money could go to whomever is agreed to by the parties.
MISC.
Yes. Not to be confused with the real estate tax exemption, the homestead exemption requires that a property owner, who loses an owner-occupied home to UNSECURED creditors, may keep a portion of the equity. In Illinois, that number rose to $15,000 per owner, not to exceed $30,000 total, on 1-1-06. |